| eDQE | Clinic. Optimiz. of CT | Medical Image Display | Tech. Optimiz. of Digital Mammo |
| Quant. Image | Emerg. Quant. Imaging | Perf. Metrology | Clinical Trials | Emerg. Clinical
|
Technique Optimization in Digital Mammography
The increased use of digital mammography has renewed the issue of optimizing the technique to achieve maximum image quality at the lowest achievable applied dose. Our recent work in this area has evaluated the dose savings possible by switching from analog to digital. Since it is the intrinsic performance of imaging systems, or the signal to noise of the system in relation to applied dose, that is a key predictor of image quality, we established a criteria for assessing the impact of technique (such as kVp settings, or target/filter combinations) on image quality by employing a figure of merit (FOM) equal to the signal-difference to noise ratio squared (SdNR2) normalized by mean glandular dose (MGD). This FOM was evaluated for both Mo-Mo and W-Rh target/filter combinations for breast thicknesses of 2 - 8 cm with various glandular compositions, using a clinical a-Se full-field digital system from Siemens Healthcare. Based on the FOM results, we assessed the dependency of system performance on spectral quality to draw conclusions regarding the achievable dose savings in the migration to new optimized techniques specific to digital mammography.
The results of our study have demonstrated that significant dose savings (on the order of 9% - 63%) could be achieved with the use of optimized W-Rh spectra in comparison with pre-existing clinical techniques using Mo-Mo, demonstrating the importance of optimizing technique for use with digital mammography systems. Our study results also suggest that the optimization of technique is independent of lesion type, i.e. there is no need to compromise the visualization of masses over calcifications, or vice versa. Studies to correlate conventional technique optimization with other optimization approaches, ie. evaluating effective detective quantum efficiency normalized by effective dose as an indicator of mammographic image quality are ongoing. Future studies expanding our optimization regimen are planned including investigation of novel target/filter combinations to determine the optimal technique for evaluating breasts in the upper range of density and thickness.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Figure of Merit as a Function of kVp for two Target/Filter Combinations
|
||
|
Figure 2: Graphs showing the relationship between the figure of merit (FOM) and kVp for both Mo-Mo and W-Rh target/filter combinations for 100% adipose (A,D), 50% adipose / 50% glandular (B,E), and 100% glandular (C,F). The FOM, defined by the ratio of SdNR2/MGD was calculated for both mass (A,B,C) and calcification (D,E,F) lesions, where SdNR is the signal-difference-to-noise ratio and MGD is the mean glandular dose. The solid grey circles represent the previously-established clinical technique based on Mo-Mo and screen/film, shown here for comparison purposes. |
Radiographic Tech. | Low-Cost Tomo | Optimiz. of Rad. Ther. | Personal CAD | Adapt. Educ. |














